Crypto PR Pricing Benchmark
Public packages with articles, estimated reach, and tier-1 outlet mix. Methodology and full data table.
By Omer Dede, Founder & CEORead the benchmark →Estimated reach shown per package · source: the benchmark's own table
Data hub
Original benchmarks and methodology from the desk that has published 100,000+ links across 300+ outlets since 2020. No recycled industry reports: data drawn from our own distribution network and public package tiers.
Crypto PR Pricing Benchmark
$1,490–$14,990Packaged crypto press-release distribution, per campaign, across seven packages.
Source: the benchmark's own table · BlockmanPR's public package catalogue
Combined reach, tier-1 DA range, outlet mix, and methodology for the 300+ outlet network. SimilarWeb + Moz.
This study is not published yet. It fills with the study’s own figures the day it goes live.
57% of genuine seasonal peaks in this market fall in September or March. Measured across 143 keywords on 3 August 2026. Plan your campaign backwards from that.
Read the article →Across 356 keywords measured on 3 August 2026, 327 are down year on year. Search volume is collapsing while cost per click rises. Here is where buyers went.
Read the article →Crypto PR pricing is notoriously opaque. Agencies quote retainers without showing outlet lists, and wire resellers bundle unknown domains behind logo walls. BlockmanPR publishes research because our model is the opposite: public packages, browsable outlets, and proof in live links.
BlockmanPR is not affiliated with the mobile game Blockman GO.
Two reasons, and neither is content marketing. First: buyers in this market cannot get a straight answer about what anything costs, so they assume everyone is overcharging them, and that assumption is expensive for the honest vendors too. Publishing our own tiers with the figures attached is cheaper than arguing about them. Second: we hold outlet data on authority, formats, turnaround and what actually gets published, which nobody else publishes at all, because most agencies treat their outlet list as the product. It is not. The judgement about which outlet fits which story is the product; the list is just a list.
Every figure we publish carries the date it was measured. If a page here has no date on a number, treat that as our mistake and tell us.